Google| Subject | Re: Sandman's obsession with Snit is EXTREME! |
| From | Snit |
| Date | 02/20/2017 17:59 (02/20/2017 09:59) |
| Message-ID | <D4D06E65.90B59%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | GreyCloud |
| Followups | Sandman (5h & 35m) > Snit GreyCloud (7h & 3m) |
On 2/20/17, 9:51 AM, in article o8f6mk$j42$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <Cumulus@mist.com>wrote:
...
Already done, in the above links (having 50% or more of your posts be ABOUT someone -- or your fantasizes of them... assuming more than just a few posts).SnitGreyCloud
I answered in full:
<https://youtu.be/HMx0RyzbPgQ> ----- Jonas Eklundh continues his lie about mere responses being a sign of obsession as opposed to directly obsessing over someone, and he admits to fantasizing about my life. -----
<https://youtu.be/UkAyrfOZaXc> ------ Jonas Eklundh asked for a better criteria to show his obsession (and the obsession of others). I selected his posts from the start of the year and show his obsession.
It is EXTREME! ------
<https://youtu.be/VxLiH-x0aeY> ----- Jonas Eklundh busted forging quotes, changing the topic from PERCENT of posts ABOUT another person to COUNT of posts that MENTION another person by name, AND he whines about these videos which he has said he likes.
Sandman just tells lie after lie after lie. Proved again. -----
Guffaw!!! Define obsession... you can't.
And you and Jonas Eklundh are clearly and unambiguously obsessed with me based on this very reasonable definition.
-- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
02/20/2017
