Google| Subject | Re: It's over, Apple was right... |
| From | Laszlo Lebrun |
| Date | 08/20/2012 07:48 (08/20/2012 07:48) |
| Message-ID | <k0sj30$a0t$1@tota-refugium.de> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | KDT |
| Followups | KDT (5h) > Laszlo Lebrun |
On 19.08.2012 23:57, KDT wrote:
KDTIs it proprietary and with fees or not? That was the question. Flash is proprietary, however do not require any fee, neither for encoding nor for decoding.
On Sunday, August 19, 2012 12:58:01 AM UTC-4, Laszlo Lebrun wrote:Laszlo LebrunKDT
On 19.08.2012 05:33, Alan Baker wrote:Alan Baker
Actually, I think they're doing their customers a service by forcingsites to provide content that isn't in a proprietary format.Laszlo Lebrun
And you seem to be convinced by this brilliant argumentation.
That is the very reason, is it?
So then, why does Apple refuse to use the WebM open videos format and
stick to H.264 which is proprietary _and_ patented _and_ requiring fees?
You mean like *every one else in the entire video industry*
-- One computer and three operating systems, not the other way round. One wife and many hotels, not the other way round ! ;-)
08/20/2012
