Skip to main content
news

Re: Eliminate Islam Now.

Rimrunner
SubjectRe: Eliminate Islam Now.
FromRimrunner
Date09/19/2001 08:57 (09/19/2001 06:57)
Message-ID<slrn9qgges.aph.rimrun@drizzle.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.arts.sf.starwars.misc
FollowsOliver J. Hanau

On Tue, 18 Sep 2001 21:31:11 +0200, Oliver J. Hanau <ojh@gmx.net>wrote:

Oliver J. Hanau
Rimrunner wrote:

And at least in my religion/faith, a strong point is made of the quality of one's acts being representative of the quality of one's faith.

Rimrunner
Your latter statement is essentially what I'm talking about. I have this notion that if people thought this way, they would be more critical of people who performed violent acts in the name of religion, and of religious sects that seemed to encourage violent behavior.

Oliver J. Hanau
Unfortunately, some people are misled enough to think that, say, crashing two planes into a couple of skyscrapers is a pretty nifty idea and demonstrates the strength of the faith of the "martyrs" who sacrificed themselves and some infidels/heathens.

Yes, well. That's where it all falls down, of course.

Rimrunner
The problem with that, of course, is that a lot of people seek religion in order to learn how to act--to find guidance for their behavior.

Oliver J. Hanau
Do you think so? I always thought people sought religion to find out why they're so freakin' unhappy in their lives or find out why they're "here."

Isn't that basically the same thing, when you get right down to it? There's got to be something comforting in getting up each morning and going about your day in a way you just KNOW God wants you to. Okay, I overstate that case, but do you see what I mean?

Rimrunner
This has traditionally been one of the roles of religion.

Oliver J. Hanau
I always thought that was the consequence of what I mentioned above. "If you want to be happy/saved, do this and don't do that."

Yeah, pretty much.

With all the math I've been doing lately [*] it makes me want to rephrase it somehwere along the linew of, "Their acts should be justified in themselves, i.e. 'good.'"

Rimrunner
Then once we've defined good, we can knock off for a beer.

Oliver J. Hanau
I was trying to be facetious. Of course, this logic works for anything, including the WTC attacks.

Yes, I know. Hence the beer.

Rimrunner
Or maybe we should knock off for the beer first, since it might help our deliberations.

Oliver J. Hanau
I did that on Sunday night when I first tried to reply to this, but I'd just gotten back from watching "A.I." and was still too confused.

No problem. I'm too tired for coherency.

Rimrunner
Yes. It's one of those thoughts that sounds pretty, but I'm not sure it's really a valid statement. I get those from time to time. Most of the time I just write them down and think them over myself

Oliver J. Hanau
I know that feeling. "Did anyone ever think about what the TITANIC did to the ICEBERG?" sounded good, too, but I've yet to find a situation to apply it to. Usually, I write that stuff down and try to use it in a screenplay, but never do.

Then, sooner or later, your characters will have some drunken philosophical debate and you can stick the line in.

-g, think i'll keep this one around for just such an occasion -- Murder of Crows @ http://www.murderofcrows.net NEXT SHOW: GoGirlsMusicFest @ Sit & Spin, Seattle, Sat Sept. 29 2001 "The risk of loss is the shadow cast by affection." -- Carolyn Hax