Skip to main content
news

Re: Slavery in Disney (was ...

?jevind L?ng
SubjectRe: Slavery in Disney (was Re: Mickey and Donald)
From?jevind L?ng
Date08/28/2004 17:14 (08/28/2004 17:14)
Message-ID<WbIXc.1258$LV3.4110@nntpserver.swip.net>
Client
Newsgroupsalt.fan.tolkien
FollowsLaurie Forbes
FollowupsLaurie Forbes (4h & 6m)

"Laurie Forbes" <moc.rr.eniam@1sebrofr>skrev i meddelandet news:XGMWc.46459$Kt5.43039@twister.nyroc.rr.com...

[snip]

Laurie Forbes
(LOL!) Well, now .... do I want everyone to think me a pommefrite? Pourquoi ? Middle-terre pas? Think about the creatures and their various portrayals. Who's "top dog," as it were, an Ent or an Elf?

There was Ellawoof, the Elven dog who was much hated in Fangorn after he peed on Treebeard's leg.

Perhaps we can say, in our typically egalitarian way, that each rules in his own sphere.

It

is much the same with Disney, except there is more mixing and mingling and no segregated milieux. We are not supposed to see one animated character

as

a tall dog with alternative dentition, nor another as an oddly-shaped duck who shouldn't even be able to walk. It would be a misviewing of the

canon

to say that mice should not command dogs, nor should a cow walk upright carrying a mem? purse and wearing too much lipstick, udder swaying seductively. Forget the particulars. These are beings who represent

certain

"qualities" or characteristics of Life (tm). It's all allegorical, and

I'm

certain Tolkien would agree with me.

After the Americna election, we might see even stranger things. We may see Georges Maquis fils appear in a new attraction at Disneyland called Politicianland. Sitting behind a desk, he will fix the tourists with a glittering eye (rather like the Ancient Mariner) and say: "Am?ricains! Am?ricaines! La plume de ma tante est s?r la table."

?jevind

Laurie Forbes (4h & 6m)