Subject | Re: Reading LotR and the newsgroups |
From | ?jevind L?ng |
Date | 08/15/2004 14:01 (08/15/2004 14:01) |
Message-ID | <ufITc.16205$qn2.2568@nntpserver.swip.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien,rec.arts.books.tolkien |
Follows | Shanahan |
ShanahanWell, to me it does; to a great extent I share your feelings . Of course, one can thirst for more of Tolkien's vision, and hence enjoy, for example, "Unfinished Tales". And I can also enjoy speculating whether, for example, Barahir, the author of "The Tale of Aragorn and Arwen" and the grandson of Faramir, was also Prince of Ithilien and if perhaps his mother was one of Aragorn's and Arwen's daughters. But I don't really enjoy never-ending scholastic discussions of B*lr*g W*ngs or the exact number of Dwarves in Moria. In fact, the feeling that there are many things untold in the background, that Tolkien's world stretches on far beyond all possible knowledge, is one of its attractions to me. At the same time, the very many different approaches to Tolkien, leading to discussions of many different kinds, are part of the attraction of these newsgroups; one does indeed realize the diversity among admirers of Tolkien's books. Like entering a pub, as many have said before.
I've never found another book that moves me as this one does. I've found many many books that I re-read dozens of times; I'm kind of a compulsive re-reader. I dive headfirst into a text, and let it snatch me from RL into its world. I willingly suspend disbelief. But only Tolkien requires no such suspension from me. Only LotR, as many times as I have read it, utterly consumes and convinces me.
I think this is why I am impatient with the D&D-type power points discussions, and the was the Balrog subservient to Sauron or not discussions, etc. etc. etc. For me these discussions trivialize and distance me from Middle Earth. Is this at all what you meant by 'banalize'?
When queried as to why the heck I would read a book over and over (usually by someone who is quietly inching away from me as they speak), they often say "You already know how it turns out!" Mindlessly teleological. I respond by asking them why they listen to certain pieces of music over and over. To me, it is the same thing. One does it, not to find out what happens, but because the work says something important, something that one needs to hear, in a way in which one wants to hear it. And in a work of sufficient complexity, say a great symphony or the Dune series, one can always find something new to "hear".Very well put. (Except for the mention of "Dune", a work that I don't much care for.)