Google| Subject | Re: Sandman's obsession with Snit is EXTREME! |
| From | Snit |
| Date | 02/21/2017 01:17 (02/20/2017 17:17) |
| Message-ID | <D4D0D53A.90C96%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Marek Novotny |
On 2/20/17, 3:57 PM, in article yeqdnQd4VKvb6TbFnZ2dnUU7-dvNnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" <marek.novotny@marspolar.com>wrote:
Marek NovotnySandman's "logic" was to flat out lie.
On 2017-02-20, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:SandmanMarek Novotny
In article <D4D06E65.90B59%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SandmanGreyCloudSnit
Guffaw!!! Define obsession... you can't.
Already done, in the above links (having 50% or more of your posts be ABOUT someone
Snit's posts that are ABOUT other people that are not in RESPONSE to those persons: 70%
My posts ABOUT Snit that are not in response TO Snit: 4.9%
Just because you spread your obsession over more than one person doesn't make you less obsessed with them.
It's like saying "You're a criminal if more than 50% of your income comes from stealing money from someone" and claim that you're not a criminal when 70% of your own income comes from stealing from ten different people.
Like I said, don't define your terms with measurable data, you never come out on top with that. You really should stick with things like "'cause I say so". It won't help the actual claim, but it wouldn't be as easy to shove down your throat with actual data. :)
I should save a few of your statistics. It does wrap logic around the issue rather than entertaining a lot of bullshit.
<https://youtu.be/HMx0RyzbPgQ> ----- Jonas Eklundh continues his lie about mere responses being a sign of obsession as opposed to directly obsessing over someone, and he admits to fantasizing about my life. -----
<https://youtu.be/UkAyrfOZaXc> ------ Jonas Eklundh asked for a better criteria to show his obsession (and the obsession of others). I selected his posts from the start of the year and show his obsession.
It is EXTREME! ------
<https://youtu.be/VxLiH-x0aeY> ----- Jonas Eklundh busted forging quotes, changing the topic from PERCENT of posts ABOUT another person to COUNT of posts that MENTION another person by name, AND he whines about these videos which he has said he likes.
Sandman just tells lie after lie after lie. Proved again. -----
You cannot be objective... so please KF me like you said you would.
-- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
02/21/2017
