Google| Subject | Re: Intel's Thunderbolt desperation... |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 2013-08-17 12:08 (2013-08-17 12:08) |
| Message-ID | <mr-5AEC8A.12082317082013@News.Individual.NET> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Flint |
In article <kumev0$m6e$1@dont-email.me>, Flint <agent001@section-31.net>wrote:
I'll happily admit to having made a mistake when You explicitly say that your claim was in error and a mistake. You *CAN* salvage this, but I think your pride is in your way, lie boy.FlintFlintSandman
I guess only idiots don't realize that even false statements require proof of >intent< to deceive in order to qualify them as lies.
I think your intention is to deceive, i.e. I think you know full well that what you said was false. That makes it a lie. Otherwise you're just enormously stupid. Which is it - stupid or a liar?
Still no substantiation, lie boy.
You are correct for once. *YOU* still provide no substantiation for your claim that I intended to lie.
On top of that, you are now waffling between claiming I >intended< to lie or am stupid.Yeah, I am leaning towards liar, but if you'd rather have me call you stupid, let me know.
The two are not compatibleMost liars are quite stupid, actually. Just look at the newbie trolls in this group, Flint.
therefore by your own words, you appear to be a waffling, equivocating liar yourself, sandflea. :-DSo, you're leaning towards being stupid, then? Very well, Flint.
-- Sandman[.net]
2013-08-14-
