Skip to main content
news

Re: Pretty cool...

Alan Baker
SubjectRe: Pretty cool...
FromAlan Baker
Date2013-06-24 22:13 (2013-06-24 13:13)
Message-ID<alangbaker-471E58.13133624062013@news.shawcable.net>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.sys.mac.advocacy
FollowsNashton

In article <kqa7ln$958$1@speranza.aioe.org>, Nashton <nana@na.ca> wrote:

Nashton
On 06-24-13 2:31 PM, ed wrote:

ed
On Monday, June 24, 2013 10:16:25 AM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote: ...

Alan Baker
The plan is to do stuff for my own projects and make it pay by doing architectural drawings for general contractors (not actual design, mind, just the drawings).

ed
i don't know if it's changed in the last few years, but solidworks was

not real solid (ha!) for architectural drawings a few years back- a lack

of architectural symbols and the like. you can download them (or create

them yourself), but it wasn't really designed for architecture and it

wasn't a strength.

Nashton
It's merely for computer assisted design. And from what I know, architectural design is not what it is primarily for. It is used for product design and is an integral part of their manufacturing process.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SolidWorks

ed
all that said, you have my curiosity piqued- is there a market for this

type of work? why wouldn't whoever is doing the design do the drawings?

...

Nashton
Definitely. See above. I had used strata few years ago for models and artwork. Then I migrated to 3dsmax which was more comprehensive for modeling.

But it isn't the modeling that I'd be doing, Nicolas, and what SolidWorks is VERY good at is producing drawings.

Plus it has capabilities that are appropriate for my own desire to design parts for my race car and for other personal projects.

-- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia "If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard."