Google| Subject | Re: It's over, Apple was right... |
| From | ed |
| Date | 2012-08-21 20:57 (2012-08-21 11:57) |
| Message-ID | <bb31dc65-ebc6-4230-b29b-820fe7824001@googlegroups.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | KDT |
| Followups | KDT (4h & 28m) > ed |
On Wednesday, August 15, 2012 9:28:15 PM UTC-7, KDT wrote:
KDT...
On Wednesday, August 15, 2012 10:53:30 PM UTC-4, ed wrote:
sh killed...ed
Apple wasn't right or wrong - they were SUCCESSFUL in getting fla=
droid devices? And that it took a 1Ghz+ phone to play video back acceptabl= y? Something that could be done on an 80Mhz iPod Classic?So it's Apple's fault that Adobe has never met it's deadlines on An=
Flash on Android because of fragmentation.....KDT
And of course Ed will never admit that Adobe had problems supporting =
pdate.htmlhttp://blogs.adobe.com/flashplayer/2012/06/flash-player-and-android-u=
h devices reliably....Even though Adobe said that devices had to be "certified" to work wit=
nd over?Oh jeebus. Why do you want to try and go over the same old crap over a=
Because you claimed that Apple doomed Flash, when in actuality Flash was =doomed on Android because....
holy thread out of control batman. apple did doom flash, without it being = android specific. as has been repeatedly pointed out here, ios- not just p= hones, but ios as a whole- has a huge marketshare. apple's refusal to allo= w flash on it shoved a knife into flash. the issues that you point out wit= h regards to android certainly didn't help (maybe apple stabbed flash, and = adobe twisted the knives themselves with their lousy execution- happy? :P)= .
1. Poor implementation. There is no excuse for it taking a 1ghz+ device t=o play video decently.=20
=20 2. The fact that it became hard for Adobe to support and "certify" all of=the different devices.
#2 was never a big issue. even now, i have flash available on a nexus 7. = totally unsupported device, that they're actively blocking. works fine. := P
2012-08-21
