Subject | Re: OT: Ping Marek |
From | Snit |
Date | 02/16/2017 16:55 (02/16/2017 08:55) |
Message-ID | <D4CB1994.902F7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (25m) > Snit |
SandmanNot everyone... but remember even when I am gone for a month or more I am mentioned more than anyone else... if not by name then as the one from prescott or "he who should not be named" or "hwsnbn" or "the thing" and on and on and on.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
In article <K4WdnYmq_KEkzj7FnZ2dnUU7-IHNnZ2d@giganews.com>, Marek Novotny wrote:SandmanMarek NovotnyMarek NovotnySteve Carroll
Correct, if I thought it was something sensitive I would have had to start the video all over again and find the message I wanted. Luckily I got the right one right off the bat. :)
It was pretty bizarre that you got *that* one, though, any of them would have been OK but I was surprised to see it get chosen in the blind like that (subliminal?).
That or blind luck... But then what he doesn't know is that 99% of the messages don't mention him at all.
Yeah, this got me wondering a bit. Snit is always on about how everyone in this group is "always" just "trolling" him instead of "focusing on technology".
<http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/mentioningsnit>Who else have you ever obsessed about as much as that! I mean, really, that is proof of a MASSIVE obsession by you. The irony: you posted it to try to push the idea you are not obsessed.