Google| Subject | Re: Pretty cool... |
| From | ZnU |
| Date | 06/14/2013 22:56 (06/14/2013 16:56) |
| Message-ID | <znu-F0A85F.16561714062013@news.eternal-september.org> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | ed |
| Followups | Steve de Mena (8d, 15h & 9m) Nashton (10d, 15h & 36m) |
In article <206fb4a3-29e5-46e1-ae2d-185e0994b0cd@e13g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>, ed <news@atwistedweb.com>wrote:
edYeah, the reason this machine doesn't have internal expandability isn't because Apple wanted to make it small. Apple has had an extremely ambivalent relationship with internal expandability for, well, about 30 years now, going all the way back to the original Mac. They've offered it when they wanted to be present in markets where there was no plausible alternative, but that's about it. With Thunderbolt 2 and dual on-board GPU options, they now believe there is a plausible alternative for the Mac Pro's user base.
On Jun 13, 9:32?pm, ZnU <z...@fake.invalid>wrote:ZnUed
In article <kp5fsj$ma...@dont-email.me>, ?"jay birdsong" <jaybirds...@aol.com>wrote:jay birdsongZnU
Of course, form over function. ?And on the plus side, you can probably heat your home with it in the winter.
This machine is, in fact, a classic example of form *following* function.
yep- this machine is obviously very well engineered and there are very good reasons for the shape. some people are clearly confusing form over function vs tradeoffs in the functions apple designed to compared to the functions they expect (primarily internal expandability).
06/14/2013
