Re: Sandman still lying abo...Snit
|Subject||Re: Sandman still lying about his CSS|
|Date||02/11/2017 16:05 (02/11/2017 08:05)|
|Followups||Sandman (2h & 11m)|
On 2/11/17, 2:05 AM, in article firstname.lastname@example.org, "Sandman" <email@example.com>wrote:
SandmanSure I am. Let us discuss:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
In article <D4C38D28.8F69Bfirstname.lastname@example.org>, Snit wrote:SandmanSnitSnitSandman
If you have any reasoning hidden behind your knee jerk accusations and dishonestly attributing the words of others to me it is simply not worth finding. I have no desire to look for a nugget of gold in your massive pile of manure.
You just got six links to post where I had reasoned responses to your lies, where you just ignored the posts. Your answer? More ignoring. Whenever your trolling is met with reasoned discussion, you are forced to abandon the thread or subthread. You have no way to combat logic and facts, no way to keep lying as a direct response to actual facts, so you *have to* ignore it. It's the only way you can cope with it.
Again, you want me to look for some nugget where you say you told the truth among your pile of lies. Not interested.
We know you're not interested in reasoned debate.
* You falsely misattributing other's words to me * You scripting of your trolling * You blaming me for YOUR actions
But in text you just refuse to and pile lies every time those are mentioned. You are not able to handle a text medium, so let's Skype. That is a medium where it is harder for you to flat out deny... you cannot as easily use your knee-jerk interruption and accusation trolling.
Which is why you will NEVER agree to it.
-- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
Sandman (2h & 11m)