news

Re: Picture of a CSMA regular?

§¼¡Ý
SubjectRe: Picture of a CSMA regular?
From§¼¡Ý
Date04/29/2004 20:13 (04/29/2004 11:13)
Message-ID<BCB693F5.4C9EB%snit@nospam.cableone.com>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.sys.mac.advocacy
FollowsSandman
FollowupsSandman (2h & 15m) > §¼¡Ý

"Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote in mr-C8CD14.17160029042004@news.fu-berlin.de on 4/29/04 8:16 AM:

Sandman
In article <BCB5866A.4C71E%snit@nospam.cableone.com>, ?? <snit@nospam.cableone.com>wrote:

§¼¡Ý
Care to define what objective criteria you use to make such a judgement?

Sandman
You are trolling, hence you are a troll. Your stupidity act where you desperatly try to act as if you're not trolling - is trolling.

§¼¡Ý
I notice you have once again not commented on any objective criteria in which I am any more of a troll that you or many other people in csma.

Gee, I wonder why that is...

Sandman
Because you're a troll Michael, and as such you are here to play games instead of listening to logic and reason. It is what you do. I, along with a lot of other posters, have already given you explanations on a wide array of subjects and you have time after time made it perfectly clear that you won't listen to that.

§¼¡Ý
Soooooo.....

What is your objective criteria for calling someone a troll?

Sandman
See what I mean?

§¼¡Ý
Yes, I see that you have no objective criteria for determining if someone is a troll.

Sandman
Incorrect, given that I've supplied said criteria.

Would you be so kind to provide a link that the post where you did so?

§¼¡Ý
You think I am a troll because you *feel* that way.

Sandman
Incorrect, given that I've supplied said criteria.

Are you able to either post to that criteria or remind me. Perhaps I am wrong on this on... would be interesting to see what your criteria is. So far it seems like it is based on your whim.

-- See responses to flames news://alt.flame.macintosh


Thread