Google| Subject | Re: Picture of a CSMA regular? |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 04/29/2004 17:16 (04/29/2004 17:16) |
| Message-ID | <mr-C8CD14.17160029042004@news.fu-berlin.de> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | §¼¡Ý |
| Followups | §¼¡Ý (2h & 57m) > Sandman |
In article <BCB5866A.4C71E%snit@nospam.cableone.com>, ?? <snit@nospam.cableone.com>wrote:
Incorrect, given that I've supplied said criteria.§¼¡ÝSandman§¼¡ÝSandman§¼¡Ý§¼¡ÝSandman
Care to define what objective criteria you use to make such a judgement?
You are trolling, hence you are a troll. Your stupidity act where you desperatly try to act as if you're not trolling - is trolling.
I notice you have once again not commented on any objective criteria in which I am any more of a troll that you or many other people in csma.
Gee, I wonder why that is...
Because you're a troll Michael, and as such you are here to play games instead of listening to logic and reason. It is what you do. I, along with a lot of other posters, have already given you explanations on a wide array of subjects and you have time after time made it perfectly clear that you won't listen to that.
Soooooo.....
What is your objective criteria for calling someone a troll?
See what I mean?
Yes, I see that you have no objective criteria for determining if someone is a troll.
You think I am a troll because you *feel* that way.Incorrect, given that I've supplied said criteria.
-- Sandman[.net]
04/28/2004-
