Google| Subject | Re: Poll: Snit Leaves i=or Snit Stays... |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 02/10/2017 06:44 (02/10/2017 06:44) |
| Message-ID | <sandman-7b15d3c0cc6bff90aa61afabfa2e0515@individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| PGP | Sandman |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Snit (10h & 2m) |
In article <D4C24E95.8F4D9%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:
SnitAnd by "accusation" you mean "quotable and fully supported exposure of Snit's lies"
He is not able to read a sentence without engaging in knee-jerk accusations.
I mean, really, look at some... he claims it is not substantiated that Carroll said he was hacked even though I provided him with direct quotesDiversion #1
he denies he is STILL going on and on about his CSSLie #1
when he clearly is, he holds me accountable for the actions of others and on and on and on and on.Lie #2
-- Sandman
02/06/2017-
