Subject | Re: Poll: Snit Leaves i=or Snit Stays... |
From | Steve Carroll |
Date | 02/07/2017 18:30 (02/07/2017 09:30) |
Message-ID | <ebe0a629-bd2b-42cd-afd4-4be22b2cfd87@googlegroups.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (3h & 59m) > Steve Carroll |
SandmanEither that or he couples it with his favorite topic, web development. like he did here. Of course, for him this is a form of digital suicide as 'evidenced' by the 'CSS King's' own site in 2017 on a modern monitor:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In article <D4BF4908.8EDFB%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SandmanSnitSandman
I challenge you to BACK your accusations.
So you can ignore it again? :-D<sandman-a459b8571216b6738922d69d8cc959a9@individual.net> <sandman-032961c6950650694b36860e4d084c0c@individual.net> <sandman-f7120e505a1061dbb77ae7dae685b93d@individual.net>SnitSandman
But you never will. Never.
Lie #1<sandman-a459b8571216b6738922d69d8cc959a9@individual.net> <sandman-032961c6950650694b36860e4d084c0c@individual.net> <sandman-f7120e505a1061dbb77ae7dae685b93d@individual.net>SnitSandman
But good to see you now deem it a lie to note your denial of Carroll claiming he was hacked.
Lie #2I knew your reading comprehension wasn't good, but damn.SnitSnitSandman
Even you know he was busted with that lie
Diversion #1
If anyone ever needs proof of the depth of your dishonesty and your inability and unwillingness to hold a conversation, YOUR post I am responding to will be a perfect example.
Run little girl, run. It's not like I expected your to challenge YOURSELF to actually respond to actual reasoning regarding your lies. Nah, you'll just make up more lies instead! Reminds me about this: "Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger." I doubt you feel all that "superior" though. But you are 100% unable to counter the facts, so you focus on the person instead, like *always* :-D