Subject | Re: Poll: Snit Leaves i=or Snit Stays... |
From | Sandman |
Date | 02/07/2017 18:11 (02/07/2017 18:11) |
Message-ID | <sandman-05004088de9433d1250ea8ecc9e27491@individual.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
PGP | Sandman |
Follows | Snit |
Followups | Snit (6m) > Sandman Steve Carroll (18m) > Sandman |
Run little girl, run. It's not like I expected your to challenge YOURSELF to actually respond to actual reasoning regarding your lies. Nah, you'll just make up more lies instead!SnitSandman
I challenge you to BACK your accusations.
So you can ignore it again? :-D<sandman-a459b8571216b6738922d69d8cc959a9@individual.net> <sandman-032961c6950650694b36860e4d084c0c@individual.net> <sandman-f7120e505a1061dbb77ae7dae685b93d@individual.net>SnitSandman
But you never will. Never.
Lie #1<sandman-a459b8571216b6738922d69d8cc959a9@individual.net> <sandman-032961c6950650694b36860e4d084c0c@individual.net> <sandman-f7120e505a1061dbb77ae7dae685b93d@individual.net>SnitSandman
But good to see you now deem it a lie to note your denial of Carroll claiming he was hacked.
Lie #2I knew your reading comprehension wasn't good, but damn.SnitSnitSandman
Even you know he was busted with that lie
Diversion #1
If anyone ever needs proof of the depth of your dishonesty and your inability and unwillingness to hold a conversation, YOUR post I am responding to will be a perfect example.
Then for more we can ask you how I "faked" your CSS failures:
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/sandman/sandman-archive.pdf>Diversion #1