Re: Next Lightroomrequires ...Sandman
|Subject||Re: Next Lightroomrequires 64bit|
|Date||02/01/2015 08:40 (02/01/2015 08:40)|
|Followups||nospam (17h & 36m)|
In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, nospam wrote:
Even so - I did NOT *blame* YOU, OR your browser. I was *WONDERING* This is English. You were an asshole without me being rude.nospamSandmanSandmannospam
I *WONDERED* what happened to your browser. I did *NOT* "blame" neither you nor your browser.
You were an asshole without a valid reason.
nope. i always have a valid reason to be an asshole :)
Not this time. Many times you do, when people are being rude to you. But this time I wasn't and you responded by being a complete ass.
once again, this has *nothing* whatsofucking ever to do with my browser or anyone elses browser (nor could it). you are completely ignorant about the issue.
Rinse and repeat.nospamSandmannospamIncorrect.Sandmannospam: it's completely irrelevant.
The only data we have suggest that up to 12% of W7 users may be on 32 bit. I don't know how reliable that data is, and no other stats site I found have the W7 versions separated, unfortunately.
it's not relevant no matter how much you argue otherwise.
It is not irrelevant no matter how much you protest.
it's not relevant no matter how much you say it is.
It's your claim, prove it correct or shut the fuck up.nospamSandmannospamSandmanYou keep saying that, based on no data what so ever. So more hot air from you.
nospam: nothing that matters or adobe wouldn't have done it.
it's common sense.
I.e. you have no data, only empty claims, like I said.
it's not an empty claim just because you say it is.
prove it wrong or stfu.
Prove it or shut the fuck up.nospamSandmannospamSince you have presented no data, it is an assumption by definition.nospam: it's not an assumption.SandmanBased on no actual data, of course, just assumption.
nospam: the number of people who run win7 on older 32 bit hardware is very low, particularly adobe users, close enough to zero to be considered zero.
Present data and make it more than an assumption.
ask microsoft. this is well known.
I.e. you have no data to support your position, like I said. Only hot air.
it's *well* known
This has not happened.nospamSandmannospamSandmanIncorrect. I am an Adobe user and a Steam user. I am not the only one, logically.
nospam: you did a quickie search and pick the first result, one which is totally irrelevant.
you're in a minority.
Another claim from you without data to support it. You're up to what, ten of those claims in this thread alone?
as opposed to you declaring something and then expecting everyone to believe it?
there is one thing where there is *extensive* data: you're full of shit.Prove it or shut the fuck up.
Incorrect.nospami didn't say there's *no* overlap.Sandman
"Totally irrelevant" suggests there is no overlap. "Not very relevant" might be a more apt description for your position. You keep making explicit claims you can't back up.
that's nothing more than word games and i backed it up anyway.
i said adobe's customers and steam's customers are worlds apart and that is correct.Prove it or shut the fuck up.
do you have proof to the contrary? nope? then stfu.It's not my claim, it's yours. You have to prove it.
nowhere did i say it was zero overlap.You made a claim without presenting data. Prove it or shut the fuck up.
Prove it or shut the fuck up.nospami have *zero* problems finding excellent restaurants.Sandman
You have thus far been 100% unable to do so in that area.
how the fuck would you know what types of restaurants i find? answer: you don't.
i'll say it again, it's not hard to find good restaurants, whether it's nearby or on a trip. it just takes a little research, research which you refuse to do.Prove it or shut the fuck up.
You made the claim. Prove it or shut the fuck up.nospamhere's a hint: you don't just put in 'good restaurants' into a search engine and hope to get useful results.Sandman
Yes, you have been 100% unsuccessful to outline a research method that would find good restaurants in that area. I know.
i don't need to outline anything.
I cited it as data about Windows 7 32bit usage, which it is.nospamprove that steam customer usage is identical to adobe.Sandman
I would, if I had claimed they were. As it is, I haven't.
you cited it as evidence, despite it being completely irrelevant.
Prove it or shut the fuck up.nospamoh right, there is no such proof.Sandman
Just as there is no proof that they are "*worlds* different", which is more hot air from you.
nothing hot air about it.
The fact whether the sky is blue can be seen by anyone. The supposed fact that Adobe customers and Steam users are "worlds apart" is not observable by looking out the window.nospamSandmannospamSandmanA claim from you based on exactly no data.
nospam: adobe knows *exactly* what their customer base is far better than you or anyone else does and they would not drop 32 bit support if it made a difference. it doesn't.
it's a complete non-issue.
it's common sense.
Again, no data. What you call "common sense" is irrelevant to the explicit claim that requires data to support it.
if i said the sky is blue, you'd want data to support it, despite everyone knowing the sky is blue.
You made the claim. Prove it or shut the fuck up.
I haven't even claimed it *is* an issues, I said in the OP that I was wondering how many Lightroom users that would be left out of Lightroom 6. You then made the incorrect claim that Lightroom 5 is 64 bit, and then offered a lot of hot air about how it's a "non-issue" without any data to support a single statement you've made.nospamwhy the hell would adobe shoot themselves in the foot? the may not be perfect, but they're not that stupid.Sandman
No one has claimed they would shoot themselves in the foot.
then their decision to drop 32 bit support is a complete non-issue, as i said long ago.
State one single claim I've made in this thread that I have been unable to support. Quote it.nospamyou, however, is a different story.Sandman
Yes, I work with facts, support and substantiation for my claims, and I don't make explicit claims I can't support. That's your department.
you work with facts you make up as you go along and you consistently make claims you can't support.
I.e. Prove it or shut the fuck up.
nospam (17h & 36m)
Next Lightroomrequires 64bit Sandman 01/30/2015 13:07
Re: Next Lightroomrequires 64bit Mayayana 01/30/2015 14:38
nospam 01/30/2015 14:56
Sandman 01/30/2015 15:04
nospam 01/30/2015 15:24
Sandman 01/30/2015 15:40
nospam 01/30/2015 16:08
Sandman 01/30/2015 17:52
nospam 01/30/2015 18:41
Tony Cooper 01/30/2015 19:09
Sandman 01/30/2015 19:29
Eric Stevens 01/30/2015 23:31
nospam 01/31/2015 01:17
Mayayana 01/30/2015 15:31
Tzortzakakis Dimitris 01/31/2015 17:10
PeterN 01/30/2015 23:16