Subject | Re: Haldex is a piece of shit, woncha agree |
From | Brake Dive, Acceleration Squat, Body Roll Works LLC |
Date | 02/25/2014 18:02 (02/25/2014 20:02) |
Message-ID | <leiibi$182$1@dont-email.me> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | David Fritzinger |
David FritzingerNevetheless it was sufficient to get the haldex "enabled" vulva stuck. If you look up at how cars with newer haldexes perform with a few wheels on rollers you might begin to grasp the idea that it did not work back then and it does not work now.
In article <lehtrq$dt$1@dont-email.me>, Nashton <nonna@nana.ca>wrote:NashtonDavid Fritzinger
On 2014-02-24 10:31 AM, Brake Dive, Acceleration Squat, Body Roll Works LLC wrote:
[snip]Nashton
This is not a rigorous test, no matter what you think, "Dave."
David FritzingerWell, I though from an accasional (frequent?) issues with grammar that'd be apparent that we are two different individuals.
Are you assuming that Brake Dive... is me? If so, you are sadly
mistaken. First, I always post under the same name, and do nothing to hide who I actually am. Second, I'm not going to talk much about different torque vectoring systems, since I don't claim to know muchwe haven't even gotten into (side to side) torque vectoring with him. He does not seem to grasp the simple idea that even BEFORE you do vectoring on the rear wheels you need to get the power transfer right BETWEEN the axles which is difficult to do unless awd is permanently engaged and evidenced by haldex system kicking in too late to provide any useful contribution towards propelling the car upward the slippery slope (link to the video was provided)
about them. And, unlike you, who will pontificate on any subject, so long as you think it make you look good (i.e "my stuff is better than your stuff"), I try not to post unless I can make a contribution. Albeit, much of the time those posts are to show how wrong you are, but that is also a contribution to the group. 8^)