Google| Subject | Re: Ideological differences between big 3 german, americans and jap trash |
| From | Nashton |
| Date | 02/23/2014 12:20 (02/23/2014 07:20) |
| Message-ID | <lecli7$6nk$1@dont-email.me> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Brake Dive, Acceleration Squat, Body Roll Works LLC |
| Followups | -hh (40m) Alan Baker (7h & 58m) Brake Dive, Acceleration Squat, Body Roll Works LLC (23h & 3m) > Nashton |
On 2014-02-23 2:29 AM, Brake Dive, Acceleration Squat, Body Roll Works LLC wrote:
Brake Dive, Acceleration Squat, Body Roll Works LLCWhat context, you bloviating idiot? The only context where understeer would be a factor in a FWD as opposed to a RWD, is at much higher speeds and generally in a track situation.
On 2/22/14, 18:41, -hh wrote:-hh
On Saturday, February 22, 2014 10:05:42 AM UTC-5, Nashton wrote:Nashton-hh
On 2014-02-21 12:49 PM, Brake Dive, Acceleration Squat, Body Roll Works LLC wrote:Brake Dive, Acceleration Squat, Body Roll Works LLCNashton
Right, they fixed the ride, but now you've got problems with the fucking understeer, cause the fucking thing got fwd.
You mean torque steer.
No, he means understeer, although not necessarily for the reason he claims.
Torque steer, OTOH, is obvious at any speed.
No, bloviator, he meant torque steer.
Brake Dive, Acceleration Squat, Body Roll Works LLCOh, merci beaucoup, Captain Obvious.
When you get at least 50% of torque to the rear axle it's a piece of cace to rotate the car once you will have turned ESP off.
So yes I meant understeer in the drivetrain layout context. Though subaru with it's outgoing symmetrican layout is notoriously unwilling to rotate. I guess it's a moot point in a pig such as Q7.Funny though, how my "pig" can leave most cars in the dust, what with a flat powerband and with 406 lbs.ft of torque available at 1750 RPM. And the thing corners like it's going out of style, especially in dynamic mode.
Alan Baker (7h & 58m)
Brake Dive, Acceleration Squat, Body Roll Works LLC (23h & 3m) > Nashton
02/07/2014-
-
-
-
