Subject | Re: As with our trolls, the problem wasn't the Mac Pro itself... It's the problem with the morons wh |
From | ed |
Date | 02/19/2014 19:34 (02/19/2014 10:34) |
Message-ID | <57e57f36-4072-4239-8169-734bd2881316@googlegroups.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | -hh |
Followups | -hh (58m) -hh (1h) |
-hhthe difference is that a 200 level dynamics class is concerned with the dynamics of the system (what's the velocity of a given forces b and c, find the linear velocity given angular velocity, spring-mass-damper problems, etc). structural dynamics classes will vary widely, but typically goes into the effect of the dynamics on the material and structure (given vibration on structure x what is the displacement, will structural damage be caused by such and such dynamic load, etc). one is a lot more relevant than the other.
On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 12:04:14 PM UTC-5, ed wrote:ed-hh
and the point i was making was, "...let alone dynamics..." :P if you took similar classes, even if your "curriculum was predates contemporary website content," you know what a dynamics class covers...
Its far more germane than Statics, since one has to have some sort of dynamic element to induce transient loads. Otherwise, there are no cycles to be concerned with fatigue potential. So if not Dynamics, then what would it be? FYI, something called 'Structural Dynamics' is still Dynamics.