Google| Subject | Re: As with our trolls, the problem wasn't the Mac Pro itself... It's the problem with the morons wh |
| From | -hh |
| Date | 02/19/2014 18:48 (02/19/2014 09:48) |
| Message-ID | <54c2a573-d7f4-4780-97bf-14ef27baac7a@googlegroups.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | ed |
| Followups | ed (45m) > -hh |
On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 12:04:14 PM UTC-5, ed wrote:
edIts far more germane than Statics, since one has to have some sort of dynamic element to induce transient loads. Otherwise, there are no cycles to be concerned with fatigue potential. So if not Dynamics, then what would it be? FYI, something called 'Structural Dynamics' is still Dynamics.
[...] and the point i was making was, "...let alone dynamics..." :P if you took similar classes, even if your "curriculum was predates contemporary website content," you know what a dynamics class covers...
... (and probably remember the class well, as probably half your engineering friends dropped engineering after it) and how it is oh-so-not-relevant.Or simply drank more to try to drown the pain.
That dog don't hunt.-hh
Oh right, the usual ed-ism: delete the part of the quote where a primary point of discussion was specifically mentioned by name. Nice going.eded-hh
i deleted the part i had no issue with / comment on.
Because the comment would have been a positive endorsement. "Check".
not really - i'm not generally a "+1" type of guy... if i had a positive endorsement, *and* something extra to say, sure.
-hh
02/07/2014-
-
-
-
