Google| Subject | Re: Windows Media Player vs. iTunes |
| From | Lewis |
| Date | 10/09/2013 23:24 (10/09/2013 21:24) |
| Message-ID | <slrnl5bibk.uog.g.kreme@mbp55.local> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Sandman |
In message <mr-CB9CA8.15544107102013@News.Individual.NET> Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:
Sandman
In article <l2ubs6$nio$1@dont-email.me>, "gluey" <jsbird@aol.com> wrote:
Ahahahahahahahahaha.gluey
They work almost the same - categorize any way you want, make playlists, etc..
However WMP is not anywhere near as ibloated as iTunes.
Also, the same songs sound much better on WMP as on iBloatTunes.
SandmanNor a brain transplant.
Michael shows off his poverty again. Can't afford $1 songs :)
-- You start a conversation you can't even finish it You're talkin' a lot, but you're not sayin' anything When I have nothing to say, my lips are sealed Say something once, why say it again?
10/07/2013-
