Skip to main content
news

Re: Windows Media Player vs...

Jay Songbird
SubjectRe: Windows Media Player vs. iTunes
FromJay Songbird
Date10/08/2013 19:28 (10/08/2013 13:28)
Message-ID<l31fbj$d2o$1@dont-email.me>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.sys.mac.advocacy
FollowsNashton

"Nashton" wrote in message news:l316sp$lg8$1@dont-email.me...

On 2013-10-08 11:53 AM, Jay Songbird wrote:

Nashton
"Nashton" wrote in message news:l2vief$tef$1@dont-email.me...

On 2013-10-07 10:54 AM, Sandman wrote:

Jay Songbird
In article <l2ubs6$nio$1@dont-email.me>, "gluey" <jsbird@aol.com> wrote:

Nashton
They work almost the same - categorize any way you want, make playlists, etc..

However WMP is not anywhere near as ibloated as iTunes.

Also, the same songs sound much better on WMP as on iBloatTunes.

Also, the same songs are cheaper from Amazon than iBloatTunes.

But for those who feel wealthy by paying more for the same ....iBloatTunes is for you.

Jay Songbird
Michael shows off his poverty again. Can't afford $1 songs :)

Don't you have to pay more than 50% of what you earn to the government of your shithole?

Nashton
Did you ever see a pic of the hovel he lives in. The outside looks like a junk yard. Ever hear of "Tobacco Road".

And the IDIOT payed $80000 for a Dodge, fer crying out loud, when he could have bought an RS5.

Yeah- a fool and his money.......................................

If the dealership wasn't 5 hours away, I'd be driving that...

Yeah - sweet.