Google| Subject | Re: Windows Media Player vs. iTunes |
| From | Jay Songbird |
| Date | 10/08/2013 16:53 (10/08/2013 10:53) |
| Message-ID | <l3168s$i6e$1@dont-email.me> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Nashton |
| Followups | Nashton (10m) > Jay Songbird |
"Nashton" wrote in message news:l2vief$tef$1@dont-email.me...
On 2013-10-07 10:54 AM, Sandman wrote:
Nashton
In article <l2ubs6$nio$1@dont-email.me>, "gluey" <jsbird@aol.com> wrote:SandmanNashton
They work almost the same - categorize any way you want, make playlists, etc..
However WMP is not anywhere near as ibloated as iTunes.
Also, the same songs sound much better on WMP as on iBloatTunes.
Also, the same songs are cheaper from Amazon than iBloatTunes.
But for those who feel wealthy by paying more for the same ....iBloatTunes is for you.
Michael shows off his poverty again. Can't afford $1 songs :)
Don't you have to pay more than 50% of what you earn to the government of your shithole?Did you ever see a pic of the hovel he lives in. The outside looks like a junk yard. Ever hear of "Tobacco Road".
10/07/2013-
