Google| Subject | Re: Windows Media Player vs. iTunes |
| From | Nashton |
| Date | 10/08/2013 02:08 (10/07/2013 21:08) |
| Message-ID | <l2vief$tef$1@dont-email.me> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (5h & 26m) > Nashton Jay Songbird (14h & 44m) > Nashton |
On 2013-10-07 10:54 AM, Sandman wrote:
SandmanDon't you have to pay more than 50% of what you earn to the government of your shithole?
In article <l2ubs6$nio$1@dont-email.me>, "gluey" <jsbird@aol.com> wrote:glueySandman
They work almost the same - categorize any way you want, make playlists, etc..
However WMP is not anywhere near as ibloated as iTunes.
Also, the same songs sound much better on WMP as on iBloatTunes.
Also, the same songs are cheaper from Amazon than iBloatTunes.
But for those who feel wealthy by paying more for the same ....iBloatTunes is for you.
Michael shows off his poverty again. Can't afford $1 songs :)
10/07/2013-
