Subject | Re: Intel's Thunderbolt desperation... |
From | Flint |
Date | 08/16/2013 08:00 (08/16/2013 02:00) |
Message-ID | <kukf5v$h69$1@dont-email.me> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (1h & 18m) > Flint |
SandmanIt is *YOUR* claim that I lied. THAT is a POSITIVE assertion, silly sandyflea, NOT a negative one. Therefore, your assertion bears the burden of proof. Provide proof that I lied, or consider your argument utterly destroyed under argumentum falsem uno, falsem omnibus...
In article <kuikeu$hm9$1@dont-email.me>, Flint <agent001@section-31.net>wrote:SandmanFlintFlintSandman
I don't feel compelled to prove eveything I posted in CSMA, either.
I know, I just make fun of your lies. You fanboys never feel compelled to substantiate *anything* you write. You just write the most outlandish things you can think of and then go "whatever, big fucking deal" when asked to actually provide support for what you say.
Carry on with the lies, Flint.
LOGIC FAIL Sandy... you've failed to prove any lies. :-D
Not at all - had they been *mistakes* then you would have admitted to them long ago. You keep posting as if your claim is still true, while knowing full well that you can't support it - that makes it a lie.FlintSandman
And now that Google is not available to you like it was, it pisses you off you can't play google-buttal AND CAN ONLY PLAY ARGUMENTUM REDICULUM!
TEEHEEHEEHEEE :-D
Wtf? *YOU* are the one that needs to support *YOUR* claim, lie boy.
me. I haven't even MADE a claim (other than to correctly point out that you're lying).You have yet to prove the 'correctness' of your point. Therefore, by your own standard, you just labeled yourself a liar... right, liar?
You made a claim, you still haven't supported it, and you haven't admitted that it may be a mistake on your part - that makes it a lie.Non-sequitur. Un unsubstantiated claim is not necessarilly a lie. It can be, but doesn't always have to be. Therefore, failing to substantiate a claim of lying makes the one making the claim a liar.
"the fanboys [who] used to claim Apple INVENTED USB" -- Flint, the liar.I guess only idiots don't realize that even false statements require proof of >intent< to deceive in order to qualify them as lies. Otherwise they remain merely unsubstantiated statements.
That will remain a lie until you have proven that it is correct, or admitted that you know it's incorrect and that it was a mistake to post it.
Carry on, liar.