Subject | Re: Pretty cool... |
From | Nashton |
Date | 06/24/2013 19:42 (06/24/2013 14:42) |
Message-ID | <kqa0ed$ik0$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Steve de Mena |
Followups | Alan Baker (14m) gaztronomical@googlemail.com (2h & 43m) Sandman (11h & 12m) |
Steve de MenaRAW photo editing with LR and CS. Huge RAW files to crunch through. OTOH, I can build my own PC for a fraction of what this cylindrical iteration of the Apple Cube will cost.
On 6/14/13 4:02 PM, Flint wrote:FlintSteve de Mena
On 6/14/2013 5:50 PM, Sandman wrote:SandmanFlint
In article <56fc85cd-6d56-42d1-80c3-632b3483f37e@googlegroups.com>, ed <news@atwistedweb.com>wrote:edSandman
On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 12:07:27 PM UTC-7, Gary wrote: ...Garyed
This is now proving that no longer do people have to follow the big noisysquare box in order to have a powerful pc.
this was never something that needed to be 'proven' - it's been plenty evident. the primary reason for a big square box is internal expandability, and apple has essentially said, yeah, we don't think that's a big deal.
Well, at least they're not saying that expandability isn't a big deal...
True. Frankly, this new design makes perfect sense (if only from Apple's POV, at the moment), and I see nothing wrong with the design metrics. I suspect that in a year or two, the PC market will follow suit in some form or another. In some respects, things like Intel's NUC and Gigabyte's BRIX units have already started down a similar path. I suspect this new Mac might finally spur some PC vendors to take thunderbolt/thunderbolt2 more seriously.
Are you going to buy a new Mac Pro, and if so, what would you use it for?
Steve