Google| Subject | Re: The Most Advanced OS of the World... |
| From | Alan Baker |
| Date | 05/04/2013 16:27 (05/04/2013 07:27) |
| Message-ID | <alangbaker-296D94.07272604052013@news.shawcable.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Laszlo Lebrun |
| Followups | Sandman (20m) Laszlo Lebrun (1h & 51m) Laszlo Lebrun (2h & 22m) |
In article <km2gbh$pst$1@tota-refugium.de>, Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com>wrote:
Laszlo LebrunPresent one. I use iTunes to sync my iPhone and iPad, and I never see any ads.
On 5/4/13 8:30 AM, Alan Baker wrote:Alan Baker
In article <km29o1$50b$1@tota-refugium.de>, Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com>wrote:Laszlo LebrunAlan BakerReally? Give some examples.Laszlo Lebrun
Jeopardizing functionality (you are not really asking as an OSX expert, are you?) Introducing nags to make some more money.
Such as...
You are not really asking as an OSX expert, are you? iTunes became a huge advertising bazaar, unfortunately it's the mandatory single point of contact with any iOS device, call it improvement, I have another opinion, and i am not alone.
Precisely. I asked for list of ways that Apple's software has done the opposite of improve and you listed the start button.Laszlo LebrunKilling a start buttonAlan Baker
This is not an example of Apple software doing "the opposite" of improving.
Of Apple? I did not even know they had a Start button!
And why do you imagine that I would be interested in anything but examples of how APPLE's software has done the opposite of improve; examples you've yet to actually give, BTW.Laszlo LebrunUnity on UbuntuAlan Baker
Ditto.
Hmm you appear to have overlooked the half of my sentence so let's reintroduce it for you: ...especially with Apple software, but also Microsoft and Canonical.
How does that address what I said?Laszlo LebrunStopping support for hardware etc...Alan Baker
Which has nothing to do with whether or not the software has improved.
Oh! You could have worked for Apple! Don't you hear all the complaints?
Right. Hence your claim that the software was inconsistent is nonsense.but you know that do you, you just have been asking to troll isn't it?Alan Baker
Look in a mirror.Laszlo LebrunAlan BakerLaszlo LebrunLaszlo LebrunAlan Baker
Sandman and the OP called them exclusively smart folders, so logically one would in the help search for "smart folders", which returns nothing since Apple call them "smart mailboxes".
What Sandman or the OP called them is irrelevant to the fact that the actual SOFTWARE only calls them "smart mailboxes".
To that fact, sure. To our discussion not.
Try again. Use English.
So just again for you: If a long thread one only speaks of "smart folders" that suddenly become "smart mailboxes" that might not be relevant "to the fact that the actual SOFTWARE only calls them smart mailboxes". This fact is objective and nothing influences it.
With respect to a discussion, it makes well a difference if the smart folders, that some were claiming to be the solution, are in fact called smart mailboxes in the software.Right. But you claimed the software was internally inconsistent on this.
"so logically one would in the help search for "smart folders", which returns nothing since Apple call them "smart mailboxes".You tried to use the fact that Jonas used the wrong term to pretend the SOFTWARE was worse in some way.
That was the very point of Sandyflea pretending to have substantiated his claim while he did only throw a *wrong* word in the discussion.
-- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia "If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard."
05/01/2013-
