Google| Subject | Re: The Most Advanced OS of the World... |
| From | Laszlo Lebrun |
| Date | 05/04/2013 10:20 (05/04/2013 10:20) |
| Message-ID | <km2gbh$pst$1@tota-refugium.de> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Alan Baker |
| Followups | Alan Baker (6h & 7m) > Laszlo Lebrun |
On 5/4/13 8:30 AM, Alan Baker wrote:
Alan Baker
In article <km29o1$50b$1@tota-refugium.de>, Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com>wrote:
You are not really asking as an OSX expert, are you? iTunes became a huge advertising bazaar, unfortunately it's the mandatory single point of contact with any iOS device, call it improvement, I have another opinion, and i am not alone.Alan BakerReally? Give some examples.Laszlo Lebrun
Jeopardizing functionality (you are not really asking as an OSX expert, are you?) Introducing nags to make some more money.
Such as...
Of Apple? I did not even know they had a Start button!Laszlo LebrunAlan Baker
Killing a start button
This is not an example of Apple software doing "the opposite" of improving.
Hmm you appear to have overlooked the half of my sentence so let's reintroduce it for you: ...especially with Apple software, but also Microsoft and Canonical.Laszlo LebrunAlan Baker
Unity on Ubuntu
Ditto.
Oh! You could have worked for Apple! Don't you hear all the complaints?Laszlo LebrunAlan Baker
Stopping support for hardware etc...
Which has nothing to do with whether or not the software has improved.
Laszlo LebrunAlan Baker
but you know that do you, you just have been asking to troll isn't it?
Look in a mirror.
So just again for you: If a long thread one only speaks of "smart folders" that suddenly become "smart mailboxes" that might not be relevant "to the fact that the actual SOFTWARE only calls them smart mailboxes". This fact is objective and nothing influences it. With respect to a discussion, it makes well a difference if the smart folders, that some were claiming to be the solution, are in fact called smart mailboxes in the software. "so logically one would in the help search for "smart folders", which returns nothing since Apple call them "smart mailboxes".Alan BakerLaszlo LebrunLaszlo LebrunAlan Baker
Sandman and the OP called them exclusively smart folders, so logically one would in the help search for "smart folders", which returns nothing since Apple call them "smart mailboxes".
What Sandman or the OP called them is irrelevant to the fact that the actual SOFTWARE only calls them "smart mailboxes".
To that fact, sure. To our discussion not.
Try again. Use English.
That was the very point of Sandyflea pretending to have substantiated his claim while he did only throw a *wrong* word in the discussion.
-- One computer and three operating systems, not the other way round. One wife and many hotels, not the other way round ! ;-)Alan BakerLaszlo LebrunLaszlo LebrunAlan Baker
Which -with permission- isn't really an appropriate designation for an own alternate representation of existing data from an external mailbox. I suppose some lawyer interacted here and Apple were not ready to pay license fees?
What are you talking about? It's a perfect suitable name...
I disagree.
Well, golly! That's definitive, isn't it?
LOL
05/01/2013-
