Subject | Re: Stupidity in motion |
From | Nashton |
Date | 04/18/2013 12:36 (04/18/2013 07:36) |
Message-ID | <kkoiaf$3ei$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | KDT |
KDTThey do, Fanguuurl. But you seem to trip on their meaning at every turn.
On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 1:37:43 PM UTC-4, Nashton wrote:NashtonKDT
On 04-17-13 12:47 PM, KDT wrote:KDT
Reading comprehension FAILNet Assets = assets - liabilities.Nashton
Nobody in their right minds considers an automobile an asset, unless
your revenue is such that $15000 for a car is a significant amount in
relation to your other real assets.
Dumbo.
Words Mean Things.
It's quite telling that in a thread titled "Stupidity in motion."
*Two* of the biggest idiots who post often don't know what an "asset" is.Oh Karl, coming from an advocate/defender of a tax dodging, greedy and proprietary for-profit organization, consider me flattered.
But on to the point, no one cares what *you* think the definition
of a word is.You seem to care very much. You can't seem to shut your pie-hole about it.
The word "asset" has had a well defined meaning since the 1600's.Get an education, web page boy.
http://oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/asset