Subject | Re: Stupidity in motion |
From | Flint |
Date | 04/18/2013 06:35 (04/18/2013 00:35) |
Message-ID | <kknt0l$efi$1@dont-email.me> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Alan Baker |
Followups | Alan Baker (3h & 54m) KDT (4h & 20m) |
Alan BakerIf I'm 'ducking', its more because of a general disdain in KDT's attempt to stick a fish hook in my mouth over a thread I have no real interest in, or his fabricated 'pickle' strawman. At no point did I even address the subject of this thread. I was simply having a bit of fun of Sandflea's "teching" moment...
In article <kknhla$qeb$1@dont-email.me>, Flint <agent001@section-31.net>wrote:FlintAlan Baker
On 4/17/2013 7:29 PM, KDT wrote:KDTFlint
On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 7:18:44 PM UTC-4, Flint wrote:FlintKDT
On 4/17/2013 7:05 PM, KDT wrote:KDT
On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 10:06:56 AM UTC-4, Flint wrote:Flint
On 4/17/2013 9:14 AM, Sandman wrote:Sandman
In article <kkm6p6$2b9$1@dont-email.me>,"jay birdsong" <jaybirdsong@aol.com>wrote:assetnounan item of property owned by a person or company, regarded ashaving value and available to meet debts, commitments, orlegacies: growth in net assets.jay birdsong
So the value of your boat grows as your loan payments diminish?BWAHAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAA.HARD ALEE we're turning a corner,Sandman
Loan?? Why would anyone take a *loan* for a car like the Charger?And again, stop letting Flint teching you English - nowhere in theabove quote does it say an asset *grows* in value.Flint
Considering you claim to be such a master of english, perhaps youshould consider a "teching" position.LOL! :-DKDTFlint
So do *you* think an asset is something that doesn't decline in value?
What does that have to do with the price of tea in china?
--
MFB
Maybe because that would say something about your command of English.
Perhaps... ...assuming I even *want* to say anything about my command of English?KDTFlint
But answering that question does leave you in a pickle doesn't it?
It's no 'pickle' to ignore an improperly framed question...
To answer truthfully you would have to make Nashton look like an idiot.
Objection your honor! The statement attempts to pose a presumptive opinion as a fact not yet entered as evidence.
On the other hand, if you agree with Nashton you end up looking like an idiot.
See above.
:-D
He's right. You're ducking.