1. Chris Ahlstrom 16 May 2013 Just plonk the fellow, Mark. He's another word-twisting cruel bastard, and anyone who deals with hims soon learns that. 2. amicus_curious 28 May 2011 <4de04885$0$17494$ec3e2dad@unlimited.usenetmonster.com> Get a clue, snit, you are not worth talking to. 3. Rotten Apple 9 Sep 2009 Your posts make even a troll like me want to puke. 4. Chance Furlong 27 Aug 2009 HPT, Wally, Sandman, C Lund, Steve Carroll and Tim Adams are not trolls and do not troll. You, on the other hand, are a troll. 5. Fa-groon 20 Aug 2009 <0001HW.C6B2D9F60005D2B4F01846D8@news.giganews.com> I've done that (killfiled snit). It's not the that I'm bugged by the Snit posts and responses to Snit per se, its that they make up such a huge percentage of the posts in this group - all out of proportion to their importance or meaning. Nothing except to appeal to saner heads to cease and desist in getting into pissing contests with this guy. They ought to know by now that engaging him is fruitless, more than fruitless, it's utterly futile. 6. hophead 20 Aug 2009 It's best to killfile snit, and if you can, set up a filter to kill any responses to snit Of course, snit also uses sockpuppets. They are pretty easy to identify fortunately and are easily killed as well 7. Sermo Malifer 9 Aug 2009 <1249831379.10252.42.camel@ubuntu.ubuntu-domain> Your response to what I wrote leads to one to believe either you're mentally ill, or your goal is to tarnish the reputation of Mac users, or both. 8. ZnU 20 Apr 2008 The Snit Circus has gotten particularly bad as of late. When I set up my filters to kill all of Snit's posts, plus direct replies to them (which is how I'm keeping things from now on), nearly 40% of the most recent 1000 articles in CSMA go out the window. Many posts further removed from Snit's are about him as well -- Steve and Wally discussing Snit between themselves or whatever. In all, something like 50% of the traffic in this group is now related to Snit insanity. I killfile Edwin because I don't have a patience to have discussions with someone who deliberately tries to waste my time. But watching *other people* tie him knots can be entertaining. The Snit-related posts are not like this. They are endless repetitions of the exact same material and/or arguments dating back *years* about who said what. They are utterly uninteresting. And they are now half of the traffic in this group! Stop. Just stop. If Snit repeats a claim you've already responded to, don't post the same material again. Just don't reply. If Snit starts some new thread to troll on an old issue, ignore him. If four or five key people in this group simply killfiled Snit, this entire problem would be gone in a week. Everyone will thank you. 9. Mayor of R'lyeh 18 Apr 2008 There's really no rock bottom in this for Snit. He's just an immature twit who gets his rocks off by being the center of attention. 10. Who Me? 18 Apr 2008 IF michael IS a teacher, it's no wonder he's home more than he's anywhere near a classroom. 11. PeterBP 30 Mar 2008 <1ieml7p.1yz754z194qhxrN%ask@me.com> Oh will you stfu. 12. CozmicDebris 23 Nov 2007 I'm done with your three year old games. The archives show my answers and your inability to process them. Keep posting your list and proving that you are an idiot troll. I will not address it any further- you being too stupid to realize and accept that is not my problem. 13. CozmicDebris 23 Nov 2007 plonk 14. chrisv 26 Jun 2007 It's people like you, Carroll, who are to blame for the success of asshole trolls like Shit. 15. AZ Nomad 24 Jun 2007 Entry #4 into the killfile. You really are an asshole. 16. John Slade 30 May 2007 Snit is not a virus, he/she is a loon. 17. Brian 29 May 2007 Has anyone ever been more universally hated on the USENET than Snit? 18. Mike Dee 28 May 2007 Hasn't snit "effed up and died", yet? Thankfully his virus hasn't broadened it's horizons and killed usenet altogether. 19. Edwin 18 May 2007 <1179497178.121555.327650@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> You've got to be out of your mind, Snit. You're the worst troll this group has ever seen. You're a liar and a forger, and you've almost destroyed this group single-handedly. For you to post a list of out of context arguments, and lies, and forgeries about your enemies labled as a "peace effort" has to be one of the craziest stunts you've pulled. It's all about your sick need for attention, your need to be center stage at all times. You'd publicly eat dog turd if you thought it would make people look at you. 20. Muahman 13 May 2007 Hey I'm certainly not the most popular poster in CSMA but you are UNIVERSALLY hated. 21. Jason McNorton 9 May 2007 Snit, I've reinstalled my OS and see my name coming up. Here's your proof in one case. You are a damn nasty troll/psycho and Sandman is not. 22. nospamatall 8 May 2007 Yet another thread ruined. Could you at least keep this stuff in your own threads? 23. -hh 30 Apr 2007 <1177887350.985117.59830@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> A troll has to have some material to work with, in order to prompt someone to talk to them. This is what you do. Time and time again. While some of the individuals that you exchange with are trolls, your error is in your belief that you are somehow different. You're not different: you too are a troll and no better than they are. Bye bye, Snit. 24. New Bee 29 Apr 2007 <1177877882.169487.292800@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> Snit just leave me alone. I'm not biased and my mind is not closed. Don't bother to try to waste more of my time. I have to ignore you. 25. Jesus 26 Apr 2007 <1177548005.925632.172690@u32g2000prd.googlegroups.com> Really, Snit. It's annoying. What are you accomplishing besides being annoying? Is that your goal? 26. Lefty Bigfoot 6 Mar 2007 <0001HW.C21305EA03DB19EAF0203648@news.verizon.net> Okay, you can't control yourself. Into the killfile you go, adios. 27. Mr. Blonde 20 Jan 2007 <1169271164.374051.232650@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> Lastly, I can't help but comment on the fact that your obsession with Sandman has actually grown since you claimed to KF him. Killfilling someone generally implies you're ignoring that person, yet you piggyback onto virtually every reply to him here and and check his website's validation status more often than most people check their e-mail. These are not the actions of a mentally balanced individual. 28. Dan Johnson 31 Dec 2006 <12pdstm576f2taa@news.supernews.com> Always happy to help a fellow troll. 29. Lefty Bigfoot 16 Dec 2006 <0001HW.C1A9709D0044A637F0305530@news.verizon.net> Okay, I tried to put up with it for a long time, but the few times you post something worth reading just aren't worth it anymore. *plonk* 30. spike1@freenet.co.uk 3 Dec 2006 The thought is probably to show everyone here just how bad a troll snit is. 31. K E 23 Oct 2006 I haven't read this board for awhile but I see that even though the trolls still roam free at least the worst troll of the lot is mostly being ignored by readers on this bb. If the few stragglers that keep replying to him would just stop responding to Snit at all this place could be worth coming back to. There's a good chance he'll pack up and take his trolling to more fertile ground. 32. John Slade 24 Aug 2006 <44ede6ab$0$8927$88260bb3@free.teranews.com> I have since plonked Snot in my killfile and he's been there every since. I suggest you guys do the same. 33. Elijah Baley 24 Aug 2006 Seriously, Snit, you need psychiatric help. Go see a doctor. 34. Stuart Krivis 15 Aug 2006 You might as well just give up and plonk him then. A snit is a snit is a snit and always will be. 35. Patrick Nihill 13 Aug 2006 <1hk0vf1.15bt8na1uje9a3N%pa_nihill@yahoo.com> I mean, honestly, who would you rather discuss something with; Dan, or someone like Zara? Or, for that matter, Snit, for whom the work 'troll' seems so painfully inadequate? 36. Donald McDaniel 10 Aug 2006 Snit, you're such a dunderhead. You just have no understanding at all. I almost feel sorry criticizing you. It's much like criticizing a poor malformed "elephant boy". 37. Carlo Coggi 7 Aug 2006 <1hjp5fe.p7fmldwm5sg0N%noemail@forme.com> He must believe he is surrounded by 'trolls' ... in the groups he trolls in, that is. I wondered if the idiotrollers like snit would reply to this thread. Of course, I didn't see his posts, only your reply. :-) 38. bobinnv 5 Aug 2006 I learned some time ago how much better this group can be if you kill file Snit. I have never understood why more people don't do the same.. 39. Carlo Coggi 3 Aug 2006 <1hji86g.9bz8wk8qtasN%noemail@forme.com> Things have suddenly gotten very peaceful. Killfile: From: snit 40. John Slade 30 Jul 2006 <44cc0ccd$0$7132$88260bb3@free.teranews.com> This is the reason I plonked Snot, I mean Snit. He hasn't a clue. I've made a fool of Snit so many times it's a shame. 41. Josh McKee 27 Jul 2006 What is obnoxious are your posts. 42. ed 20 Jul 2006 <1153411877.269352.140730@s13g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> in that post, you claimed to "have been flawlessly honest in all the time I have been posting to CSMA", which is an out and out lie. 43. Sandman 20 Jul 2006 I'll top that by killfiling Snit, effective as of now. All his posts and all threads he participate in. 44. -hh 20 Jul 2006 <1153421379.759791.90440@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> I am, however, quite obviously very, very tired of [Snits] extremely lame attempts to try to garner some attention. 45. Jim Polaski 18 Jul 2006 He's out of alignment and getting worse... 46. Edwin 17 Jul 2006 <1153114933.966025.54130@35g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> You're disgusting. 47. Mayor of R'lyeh 12 Jul 2006 That was nonsensical even by your standards. 48. Stuart Krivis 12 Jul 2006 Snit's world is very tiny 49. Mike 9 Jul 2006 This implies that there was ever a time when [Snit] wasn't in full-blown troll mode. 50. Dave Fritzinger 7 Jul 2006 <1152245837.494374.267880@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> Snit, please shut the hell up. 51. Tom Elam 7 Jul 2006 <49lsa29of4n9v740d0kffl05s4ug2h7q7h@4ax.com> Killfile Steve C. and Snit 52. Jim Polaski 7 Jul 2006 (about Snit being a bigger troll than Tom Elam) Tommie uses a rubber band and paper ball while snit uses a shotgun. 53. Chris Clement 5 Jul 2006 <1152110591.876933.97160@l70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> ugh....geez man.....let it go 54. Wally 5 Jul 2006 Sandman was able to conduct himself in an honest manner by stating an honest opinion and so you tried to ridicule that opinion by dishonestly misrepresenting it!...........yup business as usual for you Snit! 55. Tim Adams 5 Jul 2006 the troll snit started yet another thread, running away from the previous one where his lies were exposed many times over. So typical of a troll. Once again I snip michael glassers lies and distortions of the truth, as confirmed by the google record, should anybody want to read them. 56. Pawe Wojciak 27 Jun 2006 Jesus Christ, snit... 57. Edwin 27 Jun 2006 <1151429856.189876.71990@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com> He's not the liar, you are. That's in addition to you being one of the sickest, most twisted trolls this group has ever seen. 58. Mike 22 Jun 2006 Why is it trolls like you keep asking the same stupid questions when they've already been answered? 59. RichardK 20 Jun 2006 <4fpqm4F1k1vvlU2@individual.net> Just killfile him already 60. Lefty Bigfoot 19 Jun 2006 <0001HW.C0BC57E405775A0DF0488530@news.verizon.net> I would hope that Snit decides to use this group for something other than trolling, but that's not worth wasting time on. 61. Dave Fritzinger 2 Jun 2006 <1149279499.295628.224990@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> Snit, please go away. Get a life, meet a woman, do something, but please, please, please, GO AWAY!!!! 62. GreyCloud 15 May 2006 I see you are starting to see what the rest have seen. You too will plonk snit. 63. Alan Baker 9 May 2006 Lost my kill filters... Rebuild. Plonk 64. George Graves 5 May 2006 What is interesting is how Glasser seems to think that being a Mac user somehow compensates for his trolling. 65. George Graves 4 May 2006 And get rid of them. I propose that NOBODY answer any posts from Homley, Stew, Elam, zara, Snit, any of their sockpuppets or other trolls who stop by to try the fishing here ever again. Just ignore them. I know it will be hard, but if we don't answer these maggots they'll go looking for another host. Let's JUST DO IT! We have nothing to lose but our trolls. 66. Jim Polaski 25 Apr 2006 Why is it that nearly every thread you're involved in seems like it turns into some tit-for-tat, dozens of responses to OT things and garbage? 67. Timberwoof 24 Apr 2006 Plonk, Snit. 68. GreyCloud 21 Apr 2006 I only get to read some of the snit droppings occasionaly. What a sad sack troll he is. I don't know of anybody that have kill-filed you tho. I do know that a lot of people, almost unanimously, kill filed snit. 69. Henry Flam 4 Apr 2006 Better still, Snit why don't you just disappear, please. It will make the newsgroup a place worth visiting. Now it's a Snit Circus. You're much worse than the Wintrolls. 70. -hh 4 Apr 2006 <1144151953.816223.12400@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> See, you answer your own rhetorical question: you know that you're guilty. Drop it already, move on and grow up...you're being the nit picker that you go on to complain about, which perpetuation only makes you a: HYPOCRITE. Do so, and I'll report you to your ISP, complete with this posting where you've publically announced your explicit intent to further disrupt the group with OT posts. Even I'm sick and tired of your flogging of this dead horse. 71. Alan Baker 27 Feb 2006 People's perceptions of you are *formed* by behaviour and not withstanding your occasional on topic posts, I wish you'd leave too. Please note that despite the amazing silliness that is Edwin, I have never made the same wish of him. 72. Andrew J. Brehm 27 Feb 2006 <1gsnqkr.15errzta85fy2N%ajbrehm@gmail.com> You are not flamed because you speak the truth, you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting the newsgroup. 73. GreyCloud 7 Feb 2006 Guffaw!! You are still a dysfunctional troll, snerd. You are squirming now and doing the sock-puppet shuffle... or is that the embarrassed troll shuffle. 74. fibercut 12 Jan 2006 <2006011204501116807-fibercut@nospamcom> That is the problem. In the years I have been coming to CSMA I have seen in the past year a real hatred among people, besides the typical Mac vs. Windows typical argument. I feel that it is like being in a room of really young children trying there best to best the other person. The one common thing among all of this seems to be you. I hate to be like this, but facts are facts. You seem to be in the middle of a great percentage of arguments. CSMA has become less about Macs and more about "look everybody, I think he lied". Is there no end then all this picking at each other on such a personal level. CSMA has always been al little adversarial but you have personally crank it up to the point that this place is no longer fun. congratulations on stopping CSMA and making this place your own personal circus. 75. fibercut 12 Jan 2006 <2006011216523616807-fibercut@nospamcom> and good riddance. i urge all that read this stop the circus and ignore this sad individual. 76. Lars Träger 7 Jan 2006 <1h8rmca.rp9nkgv8fp1aN%Lars.Traeger@epost.de> Yes, you are stupid 77. Jeff B 23 Dec 2005 Yo, Snit. We're not pals. I think you're a git. 78. Mayor of R'lyeh 4 Dec 2005 Unable to counter my argument with facts Steve Snit...er Snit Carroll...er Steve Carroll resorts to personal attacks; just like Snit would. 79. John C. Randolph 1 Dec 2005 <2005120121514075249%jcrnospam@nospammaccom> You're nothing but a troll yourself. What are you bitching about? 80. GreyCloud 11 Sep 2005 <4324A4C3.BD2A32EF@mist.com> I'm beginning to see what you people mean. Are we sure he's a school teacher?? After all, school has started, so where does he get the time to blow? 81. Edwin 4 Sep 2005 *plonk* 82. zara 2 Sep 2005 ya know Snit, I am one of your fans. I also admit to being a Troll- why don't you admit to being a Troll also?? 83. Mike Dee 2 Sep 2005 I will no longer accuse you of lying here. Instead I can only say that you are a complete and delusional kook that happens to inhabit CSMA for the time being. That you are unaware of how deranged you actually behave further reinforces this notion. Please seek professional help. 84. ed 1 Jul 2005 sure, snit is a lying troll 85. Rick G 26 Jun 2005 I don't find Snit's trolling technique especially good, but it seems to be extremely effective... 86. Elizabot 24 May 2005 <1197vavr1mifn20@corp.supernews.com> I see you were unable to respond to the points in my post and you are back to your repetitious regurgitation mode. This is a sure sign that you have back yourself into a corner. 87. ed 29 Apr 2005 snit, you continually amaze me with how much of a liar and loser you are. you may notice a semi-regular pattern with me where i stop responding to your posts for stretches at a time, then start up responding as if you were a normal person. i suppose it's tough for the magnitude of your 'loserdom' to stick, so it loses some of it's sharpness when i stop responding to you. you almost always start responding back in a semi-normal way, but inevitably degenerate. it's once again that time. i can only ask that you pass my condolences to your wife and unborn child for having to put up with such a dishonest fool as yourself. (well, if your wife is a loser as well, just pass those condolences to the rug-rat to be; if not, double condolences to her). 88. Sandman 18 Mar 2005 He is by far the most killfiled person in the -HISTORY- of csma. I've never seen someone so disliked, almost hated, in a news group before. He has the ability to turn just about any person against him in just a few posts. On usenet, trolls do this daily, but the funny part with Michael is that I actually think he DOESN'T consider himself be a troll - damn what -EVERYONE ELSE- is calling him. Obviously they are wrong. Only Tholen himself can match this behaviour. 89. TravelinMan 17 Mar 2005 I still can't figure out what's wrong with Snit. Most people have him kill-filed and the few who don't mostly restrict their responses to 'why don't you go away, no one wants you here'. Just what would keep someone in this group with all of that animosity? Must be some kind of severe mental illness. 90. Rick 15 Mar 2005 And this little paragraph proves you to be the dishonest little schmuck you are. 91. B.B. 13 Mar 2005 Does the From: header contain the string "Snit"? If yes, then troll. Otherwise, maybe. Dunno why I had my KF on you set to expire, but it's fixed now. 92. Andrew J. Brehm 27 Feb 2005 <1gsma9c.1q4xfb6in4nrkN%ajbrehm@gmail.com> It's not "a number of trolls", it's _one_ troll. It's you. 93. Nasht0n 14 Jan 2005 <9vPFd.208802$Np3.8861744@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca> Oh, and *PLONK*. Nicolas 94. Jim Lee Jr. 13 Jan 2005 <130120050329448742%peejster01@insightbb.com> Troll 95. Nasht0n 13 Jan 2005 Snit, get a life fast. You're pathetic. 96. John Slade 28 Dec 2004 Snit is full of shit and knows little about computers. However I don't think anyone should leave based on how stupid they are. Everyone has a right to say whatever they want. If Snit wants to display his ignorance and lack of knowledge, he should have that right. 97. Bob B. 27 Dec 2004 <33bch3F3t57qjU1@individual.net> I feel your pain. This has always been pretty much a free-for-all group, but since Snit showed up, its become almost impossible to have a decent discussion about anything. 98. ZnU 27 Dec 2004 In particular, my filters to kill off Snit and direct responses to his posts *alone* account for half the traffic in this group over the last several days. 99. Dawg Tail 30 Nov 2004 PC advocates, Mac advocates, Linux advocates. Almost all of them are making similar claims about Snit. When you have so many diverse people who share a common perception where do you think the problem lies? With Snit? Or almost everyone else? The answer doesn't require an advanced degree to figure out. 100. Jeff Hoppe 18 Nov 2004 <2004111723352187903%judas@nospammyspamcom> This is a Macintosh Advocacy newsgroup. Not a 12-step recovery plan. Your medical problems or conditions won't help me achieve a greater understanding of my Mac. In fact, it detracts from it and those kinds of discussions have no place in a newsgroup such as this. 101. buzz off 17 Nov 2004 <171120041108550013%nomail@inv.inv> Snit is obviously mentally ill 102. Edwin 17 Nov 2004 <76owyod5w89c$.1cr0zlg9mv5a1$.dlg@40tude.net> The worst troll this NG has ever seen is playing the part of the victim... you can almost hear the violins playing in the background as he whines... hilarious... 103. Elijah Baley 17 Nov 2004 If there's ever been a better example of a sociopath than this Snit character I haven't seen one. 104. Dawg Tail 14 Nov 2004 <0hjfp0h74qt7jiu6n6d118eh44u3sblg7t@4ax.com> The fact that you're incapable of understanding what is written due to your unreasonable hatred of Microsoft doesn't mean that I haven't made such posts. You've already apologized for having already misread what I had previously written. What makes you think that you're correctly understanding what I'm writting now. You've got a history of reading into things what you wanted people to have said instead of what they really said. I suggest you get over this limitation of yours. It's making you look foolish. 105. George Graves 6 Nov 2004 Plonk! 106. Tim Adams 6 Nov 2004 With the election over - lets get the garbage, you included, out of CSMA 107. Jason McNorton 1 Nov 2004 You're one of the many, many paranoid people on usenet that should be confined most likely. You sit there and refresh your screen endlessly. You post the same nonsense over and over. Either you're a super troll, or you're a super mess. 108. George Graves 1 Nov 2004 You don't get it, do you? NEVER! 109. George Graves 27 Oct 2004 Jason. You have started an argument with the Snit (AKA Michael Glasser), this should not be done. He will drive you crazy with his twisted logic, his deep-rooted need to be ALWAYS right at any cost. He will move goalposts, set up strawmen, and bore you into submission with his endless pedanticism. The only way to engage him is to hit and run. NEVER engage him, it's a futile, empty procedure that will only anger you and feed him. Take my advice and STAY AWAY! 110. Steve Mackay 17 Sep 2004 Changing you name *AGAIN* to avoid kill filters. Will your bullshit never end? You really are a pathetic piece of shit, to require *THAT MUCH* attention from people who just want to ignore the likes of you. *PLONK* 111. H 12 Sep 2004 Your crappy posts are still showing up in seperate threads, are you doing this on purpose to piss people off? I dont ever censor people cause that's just retarded but if you dont fix it I'm gonna have to cause I dont wanna see your name 40 times in a row. So uh, change your client or something 112. Zaren Ankleweed 11 Sep 2004 And with that, Snit goes in the global killfile. No subject, no author, no nothing. Buh-bye. 113. Sandman 11 Sep 2004 Is Michael the official record holder of number of killfiles in csma? I may just think he is. 114. Mike Dee 30 Aug 2004 Just making it official: *plonk* I have joined that growing number from this NG to add you to their bozo bin. 115. Heywood Mogroot 19 Aug 2004 *plonk* 116. Nashton 28 Jun 2004 PLONK! End of story. Get some form of help. 117. Elizabot 13 Jun 2004 <40cb9df3$0$209$75868355@news.frii.net> I've decided to plonk you. Bye! *plonk* 118. Edwin 6 Jun 2004 <05uwc.19814$eH1.9062157@newssvr28.news.prodigy.com> Geez, enough of this oddball. *plonk* 119. Steve Mackay 3 Jun 2004 The best troll award would have to go to Snit. 120. Andrew J. Brehm 31 May 2004 <1geo0s5.gd3mmvopleweN%andrew@netneurotic.de> Snit, plonk. I should have done this some time ago when everybody said people should simply killfile you. 121. Mayor of R'lyeh 18 May 2004 <11mka0dbk7r8ernj9vrd4d30i629hvf666@4ax.com> Fuck off, Snit. *plonk* 122. Sandman 17 May 2004 Tired of the Snit Circus? I am, so I killfiled him. I strongly urge the Steves and Elizabot to do the same. 123. John Q. Public 7 Jan 2004 <070120041135240483%nomail@never.com> have not been bothered to read Snit's postings since I figured out who he is. I don't bother to filter his posts, I just consider the source and skip to the next one when I see his name.